We design concrete for 75 years. So why are we okay watching it fail in 12 to 24 months?

That’s the uncomfortable question Seth Tandett puts on the table with Dr. Jon Belkowitz in this episode.

Codes, specifications, and budgets are still written around a 50–75 year design life. But in the field, concrete surfaces are scaling, wearing, and failing in as little as a year or two. Instead of revisiting that original promise, the industry seems stuck reacting to failures instead of asking why they’re happening.

This conversation challenges some long‑held assumptions about specifications, durability, performance testing, and why compressive strength tells us almost nothing about whether concrete will actually last.
This isn’t about theory. It’s about what’s showing up on real projects—and why no one seems willing to talk about the gap between what we design for and what we’re getting.
________________________________________

WHAT YOU’LL LEARN
· Why the 75‑year design life quietly disappeared from industry conversations
· How concrete surfaces went from 20–30 year service expectations to failing in 12–24 months
· Why compressive strength is one of the most forgiving—and misleading—tests we rely on
· What durability indicators actually matter if service life is the goal
· How prescriptive specs box everyone in and protect no one
· Why performance‑based specifications are the only real path forward
· What Peter Taylor’s work gets right about protecting the concrete surface
· How warranty language misses durability altogether
· Why practical field intelligence keeps getting ignored
________________________________________

CHAPTERS
00:00 – Intro and how to support the Concrete Logic Podcast
03:42 – Why we stopped talking about 75‑year design life
06:30 – The disconnect between specs and field performance
08:59 – Why compressive strength doesn’t equal durability
12:07 – The industry’s reliance on paper over field reality
14:34 – Why specifications need to change
15:22 – Prescription vs performance‑based specs
19:12 – What should actually be specified for durability
21:28 – Using performance tests to enforce accountability
25:22 – Warranty periods and real‑world consequences
28:07 – The concrete surface as the first line of defense
31:30 – What the industry really lost—and how to get it back
________________________________________

GUEST INFO
Dr. Jon Belkowitz
Intelligent Concrete
https://www.concretelogicpodcast.com/guests/jon-belkowitz/
________________________________________

CONCRETE LOGIC PARTNERS

INTELLIGENT CONCRETE
Concrete not behaving the way it should?
Dr. Jon Belkowitz and the Intelligent Concrete team combine lab‑level testing with real‑world field experience to get to the root cause of performance issues—not just treat the symptoms.
https://www.concretelogicpodcast.com/intelligent-concrete
________________________________________

CONCRETE LOGIC ACADEMY
Earn PDHs in the same straight‑talk format as the podcast:
https://www.concretelogicpodcast.com/academy
________________________________________

SUPPORT THE PODCAST
Did you get value out of the show? Give some value back:
https://www.concretelogicpodcast.com/donate

Buy your KUIU work & hunting gear and 10% goes to the show. No added cost to you:
https://www.concretelogicpodcast.com/kuiu

Media, sponsorship, or content inquiries:
seth@concretelogicpodcast.com
________________________________________

CREDITS
Producer: Jodi Tandett & Concrete Logic Media
Music by Mike Dunton:
https://www.mdunton.com/
________________________________________

WHERE TO FIND SETH
https://www.linkedin.com/in/seth-tandett/
https://www.youtube.com/@concretelogicpodcast
https://www.concretelogicpodcast.com